• TechOps Examples
  • Posts
  • AWS Internet Gateway vs NAT Gateway – Which One to Choose?

AWS Internet Gateway vs NAT Gateway – Which One to Choose?

TechOps Examples

Hey — It's Govardhana MK 👋

Along with a use case deep dive, we identify the remote job opportunities, top news, tools, and articles in the TechOps industry.

IN TODAY'S EDITION

🧠 Use Case

  • AWS Internet Gateway vs NAT Gateway – Which One to Choose?

🚀 Top News

👀 Remote Jobs

📚️ Resources

  • 1000+ DevOps Bash Scripts 

    AWS, GCP, Kubernetes, Docker, CI/CD, APIs, SQL, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Hive, Impala, Kafka, Hadoop, Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, Azure DevOps, TeamCity, .bashrc, .vimrc, .gitconfig...

  • How HTTPS works ...in a comic!

    Have you ever wondered why a lock icon appears on your browser URL bar? And why is it important? and this comic is for you!

🛠️ TOOL OF THE DAY

Jack - A tool for managing AWS Elastic Beanstalk environments, wrapping around the AWS EB CLI.

🧠 USE CASE

AWS Internet Gateway vs NAT Gateway – Which One to Choose?

We all know AWS Internet Gateway and NAT Gateway serve distinct purposes.

If I have to simplfy,

Internet Gateway:
NAT Gateway:

But there are overlaps and potential for confusion due to their similar roles in routing traffic.

1. Exposing Private Subnets by Using an Internet Gateway (IGW)

A common mistake occurs when a private subnet is configured with a route table pointing to an IGW instead of a NAT Gateway

Impact:

  • Instances in Private subnet are directly accessible from the internet (if security groups or ACLs permit).

  • Sensitive services, such as databases, are vulnerable to attack.

2. Redundant Use of NAT Gateway in Public Subnets

Deploying a NAT Gateway for web layer in public subnets adds unnecessary complexity and costs. Public subnets already have direct outbound internet access via the IGW.

Impact:

Traffic from the web server to the internet is routed unnecessarily through the NAT Gateway, incurring:

  • Per-hour charges for the NAT Gateway.

  • Per-GB charges for data transfer through the NAT Gateway.

3. Incorrect Elastic IP Configuration for NAT Gateway

Users mistakenly assume that Elastic IPs attached to a NAT Gateway can be used for inbound internet traffic.

NAT Gateways are designed only for outbound traffic initiated by private instances.

Impact:

  • Inbound traffic to the NAT Gateway's Elastic IP is dropped because NAT Gateways do not support unsolicited inbound requests.

  • Leads to confusion, debugging effort, and delayed project timelines.

Use tools like curl or nc to verify connectivity from a private subnet instance through the NAT Gateway

These Actionable Insights May Help:

1. Subnet Categorization:

  • Public subnets: Use IGW with route table entries pointing to IGW.

  • Private subnets: Use NGW with route table entries pointing to NGW.

2. Monitor Costs:

  • Use AWS Cost Explorer to identify high NAT Gateway usage.

  • Review whether data transfer through NAT Gateway is necessary or redundant.

3. Validate Security Groups and ACLs:

  • Avoid assigning overly permissive rules in private subnets, even if they use NAT Gateway.

  • Use aws ec2 describe-security-groups to audit rules.

You may even like:

Looking to promote your company, product, service, or event to 21,000+ TechOps Professionals? Let's work together.